Graphic Novels Genesis and Power: Who watches the Watchmen?

 

before-watchmen

This month is graphic novels month, which I am very very excited for! Though I am not as much an aficionado of graphic novels as Yash, nor an online comics fan like Janet, but I do enjoy graphic novels whenever I get my hands on them. I love the mixture of text and image to convey an intricate story, I love the fast pace, I love the depth that can come out of a novel with so little words and I love that books and stories that blend pictures and words are, finally, being accepted as literature that can be enjoyed by anyone. It’s just so darn wonderful and fascinating!

For many reasons my all-time favourite graphic novels is The Watchmen (1987) by Alan Moore. Moore changed the face of superheroes and reinvented what we now call the graphic novel – but to get down to that I’ll have to go into a little bit of history.

Comics arose in the 1930s in an effort (by William Hearts and Joseph Pulitzer) to sell more newspapers. The comics were meant to entice the less literate people – that would be the illiterate poor and the non-English speaking immigrants. Then came the golden age for comics which spanned the 30s and 40s and began the superhero story with the debut of such famous superheroes as Superman (1938), Batman (1939) and Wonderwoman (1941) among many others. Comics, like any other mode, were a product of their time and the superhero stories were very much fuelled by the heroism and nationalism of World War II. However, grownups fighting crime in tights didn’t garner much respect in the literature sphere and this in combination with the original intention that comics reach the less literate, earned comics earned it’s reputation as a base type of literature meant only for immigrants, poor people and children (doesn’t that make you cringe?). This is s stereotype that, arguably, comics still fight with today. Perhaps because of this controversy the very definition of the term Comic is something difficult to pin-down and one of the many reasons for the rise of the “Graphic Novel”. Scott McCloud, an authority on Comics and graphic novels, attempted to settle the discussion by defining comics as “juxtaposed pictorial and other images in a deliberate sequence” (Understanding Comics 9).  This definition is the reigning most accepted definition, though it remains unsatisfactorily broad.

Comics have faced unending challenges, including The Comics Code Authority, censorship at all levels, and simply being banned. Yet the mode endures. In the search for a more respectable title, free of negative connotations and stereotypes, comics creators, and most famously Will Eisner, began circulating the term “Graphic Novel”. While some dismissed the new term as an attempt to earn comics un-earned prestige and as simply another term for a longer comic book. The graphic novel, as Eisner saw it, was distinct from the comic book in many ways, saying:

“If a comic is a melody, a graphic novel can be a symphony.”

Which, I think, is where The Watchmen comes in as a cornerstone for the graphic novel format. Alan Moore with The Watchmen helped to distinguish graphic novels as simultaneously distinct from comics and literature that one could engage with critically. Moore plays, not only with the history of the comic book but with the format itself, including within the novel: essay text, comic book text and of course the graphic novel plot itself.

The-Watchmen

The Watchmen takes place in a very normal, if not slightly dystopian world. Superheroes don’t actually exist in the same capacity as they do in the Marvel Universe, for example, but rather are everyday people dressing up in costume to fight crime and injustice – which makes the fighting scenes all that much more bloody and brutal. The exception to the rest of the Watchmen is Dr. Manhatten (the blue guy) who fell prey to a nuclear science accident which ended up giving him God-like abilities. The story shifts between timelines. The past depicts how the Superheroes began and used to be hailed as heroes in the time of the Vietnam war, and then their fall from grace when the public quickly turned against the heroes and they were disbanded by law. The present timeline shows how the descendent’s of these superheroes, who have had to abandon their superhero ways, are coping with real life. Even in this very brief outline echoes of the history of comics are apparent – the rise of the superhero. Here everyone longs to be ‘super’ it’s an escapism and a fantasy that is toyed with even today, however, The Watchmen doesn’t really present real superheroes which invites an instant disillusionment from that fantasy these are just normal people dressed in tights and fighting crime – that’s just… dangerous! Then the superheroes of old are seen as base and unwanted which leads to a law prohibiting them from acting as superheroes any longer (which mirrors the CCA).

The story opens and follows a kind of whodunit plotline as the first pages depict the murder of an old Superhero, The Comedian, and then picks up with Rorschach as the broken down hard-boiled detective endeavouring to crack the case. The killing of the Comedian within the first few pages can be seen as a shedding of the term ‘Comic,’ not only is the Comedian character the most corrupt and vile character in the story it his his death that begins the unravelling of the graphic novel plotline and intertextual format.

 Comedian_Falls

Immediately Rorschach begins to unearth all of the old superheroes in an attempt to uncover both the motive for the murder and murderer. In so doing Rorschach rekindles in the dormant heroes the desire to fight injustice and re-awaken their fellow heroes – this part of the text has character reflect on the inadequacies of the superhero genre and the superhero itself. Wherever there are superhero there are also supervillains and who is to stop a superhero from becoming a supervillain? Or from exacting personal vengeance as justice? Indeed, while being a hero can be valorous, who watches the Watchmen and stops them before they go to far?

Something which has been pointed out often is how much The Watchmen is not for children – which I find interesting as the text features a child character reading through a comic series called The Tales of the Black Freighter. I have to admit upon first read through of The Watchman this portion of the story mystified me a little, and why have a child character eagerly read this horrific comic? The comic tells the story of a man that survives an attack from the Black Freighter, a ship manned eternally by doomed souls, and his frantic journey back home. He believes the ship will next attack his home-town harbour and so, in order to avert disaster, he plans to reach his home first. He crafts a raft out of the bodies of his dead compatriots (which is pretty gruesome) and embarks on a journey that brings him to the brink of madness (a character shift very similar to Rorschach’s). When he reaches his home, he believes it to have already fallen – but not so. In his attempt to exact revenge on his enemies he kills his own family in their sleep. He then sees the Black Freighter in the distance and realizes that he has become one of it’s damned souls (which mirrors both Dr. Manhatten and Ozymandius’s character genesis). What I think this plotline is meant to do is mirror the world of The Watchman and so reflect on how The Watchman mirrors our own world – which is rather bleak but also asserts the desire for true heroics and the simultaneous impossibility for their existence. Even with the best intentions, such as Rorschach, it is truly impossible to call him a ‘hero’ in the same way that is is clear that Superman is.

However, I also think that The Black Freighter storyline is meant to point out that this kind of literature is not for an exclusive audience at all – and more importantly, that perhaps it is important that literature cannot me kept from anyone, all one need have is a desire to read stories.

  • An interesting point here is that several adults who are trying to learn to read, both illiterates and immigrants, are being given basic comics that are deemed “educational” for their reading level. I used to have a list of Marvel and DC comics that were acceptable to suggest to English Language Learner families as a means of the entire family learning base language skills (I think the idea behind that is that the family could have fun with it, therefore wanting to learn more).

    I also have a few good friends who had a ‘comic book and graphic novel’ tv hour on our college cable network, twice a week. They were one of the highest rated shows we had, and were invited to speak to two of the classes…one Education and one English Lit. Yet when I was in elementary school, the idea of having a comic if you weren’t a boy, a bad boy at that, was insane. I had to hide my love of them. I think the movies that have come out have really helped in that regard.

    and I’m rambling now…thank you for the post. I loved reading it and look forward to more.

    http://www.facebook.com/TyreeTomes
    http://alaynabellesmom.wordpress.com

    • Yes! Even today.

      I have a young cousin whose classmate only reads Batman, that’s it. But his teacher told him that it didn’t count as a book and he wasn’t allowed to bring it into the classroom. Now that little boy doesn’t read anything at all. This is a travesty – open your minds, pictures and words work together to tell a story just as gripping as anything that only text can do. There is a unique power there. ^_^

      Thanks for the comment!

      Cheers!

      • You might suggest the Bad Kitty series, the Diary of a Wimpy Kid, or Hugo. There are several other books of the same type that are on the Scholastic and Accelerated Reader lists that are basically just junior graphic novels. That way the teacher feels in control and like the student is “learning appropriately” and the boy can still read his stories.
        I might also suggest allowing him to read a Batman as a reward for reading the ‘required’ material and then having him write a journal entry or paragraph on what he read.

        • Excellent suggestions! I’ll see what I can suggest.

          It’s just irritating that a teacher would disallow a student to read what he wants to read at such a young age.

          • As a teacher I can see both sides of the issue…they have rules and regulations for EVERYTHING now. It is absolutely terrible. But there are ways to get around it without having to discourage someone like that. You just have to be creative, and a lot of teachers don’t take the time anymore.

            I hope this one does now!

  • I have to admit that it’s taken me a LONG time to get into comics/manga/graphic novels, but your opening paragraphs describes them so well. I’m finally getting comfortable reading them, and it’s true — they can convey SO MUCH with so few words!

    I love that you’re highlighting Watchmen here, because that is probably one of the main comics that convinced me I liked them! (Although, admittedly, I did experience it through the “motion comic” — which was EXCELLENT.) I didn’t realize all of the history here, especially in regards to the origins of the term “graphic novel” but I love that Watchmen was the progenitor of a movement! One of my favorite parts of Watchmen is those little interludes with the extra/different content between chapters, and that whole little side story with the pirates.

    In fact, for a little while there, I actually thought that the Black Freighter story was Rorschach’s backstory or something! I loved him as a character, by the way, as well as Dr. Manhattan and Ozymandias. So much social commentary and moral questioning going on!

    What a fantastic post, Steph — I’m so glad you wrote this! it makes me want to read the whole series all over again.

    • The first time I read through I too thought that the anonymous author of The Black Freighter (that pirate story) was Rorschach!
      There must be something there!

      • I think it’s definitely because of how well it mirrors Rorschach’s story, and turns into this beautifully poetic thing. Ahh, I love that series! 🙂

  • I’m always torn on Watchmen and Moore. It’s a brilliant comic and Moore is a brilliant writer, but at the same time, golly, he’s a creepy creeper!

    As for Graphic Novels, the best definition I ever heard came from an ancient show on Sci-fi Channel that focused on what was new in the world of comics: A graphic novel is a comic that takes more than one trip to the bathroom to finish.

    In defense of those parents in the 30s and 40s, even the flagship titans of comic books were REALLY badly written, and most of them stayed that way until the end of the Silver Age. 1939 Batman smoking a dad-pipe: cool. 1939 Batman warning Catwoman ‘Quiet, or Papa Spank’: not so cool. I respect Bob Kane for coming up with the design of my favorite hero, but Bill Finger was a lousy writer and Bob wasn’t a good enough artist to make up for it a lot of times. But I’d be really interested in seeing what an adaptation of Grant Morrison’s final script for Serious House on Serious Earth would look like done in Bob’s style.

    • Oh! That does sound really interesting! ^_^

      And great definition! I mean, for sure, a Comic is a serial in which you might only get a snippet of a story whereas a graphic novel is much longer and is usually (not always) a self contained story arc.

      I have concede that you are right to point out the lousy writing. However, these comics were a product of their time and so some things can be forgiven in context. I think that, perhaps, the Comedian’s character nods towards the genre being stuck in that time period – and of course, that time period being just as awful as his character. ^_^;

      Thanks for the comment!

      • I think one of the reasons why I love the Batman: Brave and the Bold cartoon series so much is because it does a wonderful job capturing the over-the-top hijinks and fun of the silver-age team-ups era but it has the modern-age self-awareness so that the characters come across more as genre-savvy rather than campy.

        Alan Moore was one of the first mainstream comic writers who definitely thought and showed that comics could have literary value, but I feel like Grant Morrison (even though he can be a bit hackey) was able to show it could be done while still having some fun with it. Mr. Moore, based on most interviews he’s given, doesn’t sound like someone who would be fun to talk comics with.

        • Haha – he is rather… stiff? Is that a good word for it?

          He’s certainly always thinking about it and he’s very serious, for sure. I’ve read quite a few articles that quote him directly, so he’s very theoretical, but you are right – he isn’t have fun per se. I am on hold for a Grant Morrison book at the VPL, hopefully I’ll get it before the month is out and get to write something about it.

          Cheers!

          • I’d say more… Angry? Bitter? Cantankerous?

            Anyway, I’ll be looking forward to the rest of the month where I’ll probably be bugging you here and plugging you there.

            • Please do!

              I think cantankerous is appropriate 😉

  • Pingback: Why I’m Done with Manga & Anime | Cirsova()